Home :: Sunday Sentiments

Sunday Sentiments

  • Women in Parliament

    Posted On March 11, 2010

    By Karan Thapar

    The Women’s Reservation Bill is an illuminating example of how politicians can promote a deserving cause in a most unfortunate way. In Mahatma Gandhi’s terms, where the means are more important than the end, this is particularly damning.

    No sensible person can deny that India must have more women MPs. The country’s present tally of 10 percent in the Lok Sabha is embarrassing. Our neighbours fare far better with Pakistan, Bangladesh and Nepal at 17, 19 and 33 percent respectively. Little Rwanda actually has 56 percent.

    The question is: how should India boost the tally? The Women’s Reservation Bill does so by reserving 33 percent seats in the Lok Sabha. But is this the best way? I would say no for three reasons.

    First, as a principle, reservations cause offence because they amount to discrimination. India accepts that the schedule castes and tribes, because of their special history, deserve reservations. No such consensus exists for women.

    Second, on top of 22.5 percent for the scheduled castes and tribes, 33 percent for women (although some of it would overlap) would push up the total reservations in the Lok Sabha to around 48 percent. That means non-SC/ST men (78 percent of the male population) can only contest 52 percent of the Lok Sabha seats! Is this acceptable in a democracy?

    Third, the way these 33 percent seats are to be reserved will undermine the key relationship in a parliamentary democracy between an MP and his/her constituency. This is because they are reserved for only one out of a set of three elections. Clearly, therefore, the winning women MPs will have limited incentive to nurture their constituencies. Indeed, this could also apply to the MPs they replace. That’s possibly 66 percent of the Lok Sabha!

    These problems would persist regardless of whether the reservations are implemented for women as a whole or in sub-divisions reflecting different castes and minority groups. They vitiate this bill.

    There are, however, other ways of boosting the number of women MPs. They aren’t perfect but their infirmities may not be as many or as serious.

    You could, for instance, create additional seats and reserve them for women. This would still annoy those who don’t like reservations but avoid the damaging rotation of seats. Or you could create dual member constituencies where the new MP is a woman. This would still involve reservations and rotation but increase the number of constituencies. Neither alternative would displace men.

    But perhaps the best way is to emulate Tony Blair. In 1997 he increased the number of women candidates fielded by Labour thus ensuring that over a hundred were elected. In our case the Representation of People’s Act could be amended to require parties to field a minimum percentage of women candidates.

    To ensure that political parties don’t circumvent the spirit of this requirement by choosing women for unwinnable seats – eg.  Samajwadi fulfilling the law by fielding women from Tamil Nadu, where they stand no chance of wining – the amendment could say that the percentage has to be implemented state-wise.

    No doubt it would take time for parties to fully implement this both in spirit as well as in fact but, ultimately, because parties field candidates to win, the number of elected women would shoot up.

    Now that Pranab Mukherjee has (belatedly) said the government is willing to consider amendments and, if necessary, send the bill back to the Rajya Sabha, why not start afresh with new improved proposals for increasing women MPs?

Share this Video:

There are no comments on this sunday sentiments yet.

Characters remaining (3000)

Will be displayedWill not be displayed

Will be displayed

Please answer this simple math question.

5 + 1